Superman III and the Case of the Evil Coffee Guy
"Superman III" (1983), directed by Richard Lester, combines humor and whimsy in a nostalgic adventure. Rating: 5.0/10.
"Superman III" is not just a movie. It's an experience in how far you can push a superhero before things go completely off the rails.
Released in 1983, this cinematic whirlwind was directed by Richard Lester, who seemed determined to answer the question of what happens when you mix high-stakes heroics with slapstick comedy, weather machines, and a villain obsessed with coffee.
Christopher Reeve returns as Superman, still the hero we all deserve. At the same time, Richard Pryor joins the cast as Gus Gorman, a computer genius whose tech skills operate on the logic of a Saturday morning cartoon.
Add Robert Vaughn as Ross Webster, the corporate baddie with world domination plans that sound like a rejected pitch for an infomercial, and you've got a film that's either brilliantly bonkers or just plain bonkers.
This is a movie where Superman, the symbol of justice and hope, ends up battling his own evil twin in a junkyard while the rest of the plot unfolds like a fever dream someone had after eating too much candy.
It's ambitious in the way that a six-year-old building a rocket out of cardboard boxes is ambitious. And like that six-year-old's rocket, it's full of heart but prone to falling apart under the weight of its own ridiculousness.
Attribute | Details |
---|---|
Title | Superman III |
Director | Richard Lester |
Writer | Jerry Siegel, Joe Shuster, David Newman |
Actors or Actresses | Christopher Reeve, Richard Pryor, Margot Kidder |
Rated | PG |
Runtime | 125 min |
Box Office | $59,950,623 |
U.S. Release Date | 17 Jun 1983 |
Quality Score | 5.0/10 |
Synopsis
The plot of "Superman III" is like a buffet where someone accidentally mixed up all the ingredients. It starts with Gus Gorman stumbling into the role of evil mastermind because he discovers he's a whiz at hacking. And by hacking, I mean typing a few commands into a computer that apparently has the power to control everything from weather patterns to bank accounts.
Gus is quickly recruited by Ross Webster, a villain whose grand plan is to corner the coffee market. Yes, coffee. Forget global destruction or mind control. Ross just really wants to mess with your morning brew.
Meanwhile, Superman is doing his usual hero thing until he comes into contact with synthetic kryptonite. Instead of weakening him or turning him into a puddle, this knockoff kryptonite flips a moral switch.
Suddenly, Superman is straightening the Leaning Tower of Pisa and hitting on women like he's auditioning for a soap opera. The film builds to an unforgettable sequence where Good Superman fights Evil Superman in a junkyard, a battle that is equal parts bizarre and mesmerizing. Imagine your uncle at a family barbecue getting into an argument with his reflection in the grill, and you'll be halfway there.
Of course, there's also the obligatory love subplot, this time with Lana Lang, played by Annette O'Toole. Their chemistry is as awkward as a first date at a mime performance.
All the while, Ross Webster's evil scheme culminates in a showdown involving a supercomputer that looks like it escaped from an old episode of "Doctor Who." The stakes are low, the absurdity is high, and yet you can't stop watching.
Theme
"Superman III" does flirt with deeper ideas, like identity, morality, and the corrupting influence of power. But it delivers these themes with the subtlety of a clown car driving through a plate glass window.
The Good Superman versus Evil Superman storyline could have been a thought-provoking exploration of the duality of man. Instead, it's an excuse for a fistfight where the winner gets custody of the cape.
Then there's the film's stab at tackling corporate greed. Ross Webster is less a menacing villain and more of a caricature of every overly ambitious CEO. His plan to manipulate global coffee supplies might have been a biting commentary on capitalism, but it ends up feeling like the setup for a bad joke. It's as if the movie is saying, "What's scarier than a supervillain? A billionaire with a caffeine addiction."
Even the romance subplot between Clark Kent and Lana Lang attempts to show a softer, more human side of Superman. But it's hard to focus on their budding relationship when the rest of the film is hurling slapstick gags and over-the-top action sequences at you like confetti at a parade.
The heart is there, buried beneath layers of chaos and comedy, but it's often overshadowed by the film's insistence on being a spectacle first and a story second.
Who Will Watch This
"Superman III" is not for the faint of heart or the overly analytical. This is a film for people who can appreciate the absurd and embrace the idea that sometimes it's okay for a superhero movie to be silly. If you've ever found yourself laughing at the campy charm of old-school sci-fi or cheering on a B-movie that knows exactly how ridiculous it is, this movie will be right up your alley.
This is the kind of film best enjoyed in a group setting. Invite your friends, load up on popcorn, and prepare to laugh at the sheer audacity of it all.
From Superman fixing an oil tanker spill to Richard Pryor skiing off the side of a skyscraper, the film offers one outrageous moment after another. It's the cinematic equivalent of a variety show where every act tries to outdo the last in sheer wackiness.
Families with kids might also find some enjoyment here, provided the adults are willing to roll with the sillier moments. Younger viewers will love the colorful action and larger-than-life characters. While parents can enjoy a nostalgic trip back to the '80s, a time when superhero movies didn't take themselves quite so seriously.
At the end of the day, "Superman III" is an unapologetic mishmash of comedy, action, and camp that dares to ask the question, "What if Superman just had a really weird week?"
It's not the best Superman movie and definitely not the most coherent. But it's got heart, it's got laughs, and it's got Richard Pryor in a cowboy hat. And honestly, isn't that enough?